<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free publicity for Suicide Girls?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://utterdoul.wordpress.com/2005/09/29/free-publicity-for-suicide-girls-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://utterdoul.wordpress.com/2005/09/29/free-publicity-for-suicide-girls-2/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 06:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Utter Doul</title>
		<link>http://utterdoul.wordpress.com/2005/09/29/free-publicity-for-suicide-girls-2/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Utter Doul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utterdoul.wordpress.com/2005/09/29/free-publicity-for-suicide-girls-2/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the links, I&#039;ll check &#039;em out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the links, I&#8217;ll check &#8216;em out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://utterdoul.wordpress.com/2005/09/29/free-publicity-for-suicide-girls-2/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://utterdoul.wordpress.com/2005/09/29/free-publicity-for-suicide-girls-2/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>http://www.livejournal.com/users/dia_y_dolor

I believe the truth to your question lies within, it&#039;s a very short, pointed, read-only blog

Also, check out 

http://www.livejournal.com/users/sicily11

It&#039;s not a publicity stunt. The removal of the photos were an attempt to keep the site listed as softcore during a Federal Criminal Court Case that is total b.s. which they&#039;ve been attempting to cover-up. Blame George Bush? Blame Sean Suhl. 

Also, it was a convenient way to diffuse attention away from the +30 models who left over a few weeks, most of whom were the highest rated models and most intimate with the site owner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.livejournal.com/users/dia_y_dolor" rel="nofollow">http://www.livejournal.com/users/dia_y_dolor</a></p>
<p>I believe the truth to your question lies within, it&#8217;s a very short, pointed, read-only blog</p>
<p>Also, check out </p>
<p><a href="http://www.livejournal.com/users/sicily11" rel="nofollow">http://www.livejournal.com/users/sicily11</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a publicity stunt. The removal of the photos were an attempt to keep the site listed as softcore during a Federal Criminal Court Case that is total b.s. which they&#8217;ve been attempting to cover-up. Blame George Bush? Blame Sean Suhl. </p>
<p>Also, it was a convenient way to diffuse attention away from the +30 models who left over a few weeks, most of whom were the highest rated models and most intimate with the site owner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
